What are the different types of surgery for prostate cancer?
The following are some of the different surgical options used to treat prostate
cancer:
- radical prostatectomy
an open-surgery procedure in which the entire prostate gland and some tissue around
it are removed. This surgery involves an incision in either the abdomen or the scrotum
area.
- transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)
surgery to remove part of the prostate gland that surrounds the urethra by using
a small tool that is placed inside the prostate through the urethra. There is no
incision with this method.
- cryosurgery
a procedure that involves killing the cancer by freezing the cells with a small,
metal tool placed in the tumor.
Possible complications or side effects of prostate cancer surgery
Long-term, serious side effects are somewhat less common now than in the past, as
new surgical methods continue to be introduced. New, nerve-sparing surgical procedures
may prevent permanent injury to the nerves that control erection, and damage to
the opening of the bladder. However, possible complications and side effects of
prostate cancer surgery still exist. Be sure to discuss the following with your
physician before a surgical procedure:
- Incontinence
Incontinence is the inability to control urine and may result in leakage or dribbling
of urine, especially just after surgery. Normal control returns for many patients
within several weeks or months after surgery, although some patients become permanently
incontinent.
- Impotence
Impotence is the inability to have an erection of the penis. For a month, or so,
after surgery, most men are not able to get an erection. Eventually, approximately
40 to 60 percent of men will be able to get an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse,
but without ejaculation of semen, since removal of the prostate gland prevents that
process.
This effect on a man's ability to achieve an erection is related to the stage of
the cancer and the patient's age. However, most men who have surgery should expect
some decrease in their ability to have an erection. For men who are completely impotent
after surgery, several solutions are available.
Non-Surgical Treatment Options
Radiation Therapy
One of the most advanced treatment options available for prostate cancer is a new
radiation targeting tool called the Calypso targeting advice. The Nebraska Medical
Center was one of five sites in the country that participated in a pivotal clinical
trial that led to FDA approval of Calypso which has been incorporated into its standard
of care for prostate patients.
Calypso provides several advantages over other targeting systems in use today including
quicker localization of the tumor as well as the elimination of subjectivity during
targeting. It is the only FDA approved targeting technology that can track the prostate
position in real time as the 10- to15-minute radiation treatment is being delivered.
Calypso is expected to result in improved cure rates and decreased side effects
for men with prostate cancer. It may also represent the most effective available
treatment option when there are high risk features or evidence of the prostate cancer
extending locally beyond the prostate gland.
How it works
The targeting tool relies on electromagnetic “beacons” to localize the prostate,
which provide more exact tracking of the prostate and accounts for slight movements
before and during treatment. Working much like a global positioning device, the
implanted beacons emit individualized radiofrequency signal which triangulate the
position of the prostate during treatment. This allows for correction during treatment
due to any prostate movement.
Advantages
Some of the advantages of Calypso targeted IMRT over prostatectomy include a better
chance for cure when the cancer has locally extended beyond the prostate, most likely
at least an equivalent chance for cure when the cancer is contained within the prostate,
a much better chance of avoiding any urinary incontinence, and an excellent chance
for potency preservation in men who have normal erectile function at diagnosis.
It should also be noted that men treated with radiation have a potentially higher
risk of bowel symptoms post- treatment compared to surgery. The incidence of long
term bowel side effects is under 5 percent in men treated at the Nebraska Medical
Center since 1999.
The effectiveness of IMRT is also dependent on delivering a higher radiation dose.
Not all radiation oncology centers deliver the higher prostate radiation doses associated
with the best outcome. The Nebraska Medical Center has been using dose escalation
for prostate cancer since 1999.
The Nebraska Medical Center also plans to participate in a clinical trial that will
evaluate the administration of increasing radiation dosages, while reducing the
number of treatments from 40 to 26 and the total treatment interval from eight weeks
to five weeks which may further improve the cure rates for prostate cancer.